TY - JOUR
T1 - Quantitative assessment of paravalvular leakage after transcatheter aortic valve replacement using a patient-specific pulsatile flow model
AU - Tanaka, Yutaka
AU - Saito, Shigeru
AU - Sasuga, Saeko
AU - Takahashi, Azuma
AU - Aoyama, Yusuke
AU - Obama, Kazuto
AU - Umezu, Mitsuo
AU - Iwasaki, Kiyotaka
N1 - Funding Information:
This research was supported by the Research on Regulatory Science of Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices from the Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development ( 17mk0102042h0003 ).
Publisher Copyright:
© 2017 The Authors
PY - 2018/5/1
Y1 - 2018/5/1
N2 - Background: Quantitative assessment of post-transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) aortic regurgitation (AR) remains challenging. We developed patient-specific anatomical models with pulsatile flow circuit and investigated factors associated with AR after TAVR. Methods: Based on pre-procedural computed tomography (CT) data of the six patients who underwent transfemoral TAVR using a 23-mm SAPIEN XT, anatomically and mechanically equivalent aortic valve models were developed. Forward flow and heart rate of each patient in two days after TAVR were duplicated under mean aortic pressure of 80 mm Hg. Paravalvular leakage (PVL) volume in basal and additional conditions was measured for each model using an electromagnetic flow sensor. Incompletely apposed tract between the transcatheter and aortic valves was examined using a micro-CT. Results: PVL volume in each patient-specific model was consistent with each patient's PVL grade, and was affected by hemodynamic conditions. PVL and total regurgitation volume increased with the mean aortic pressure, whereas closing volume did not change. In contrast, closing volume increased proportionately with heart rate, but PVL did not change. The minimal cross-sectional gap had a positive correlation with the PVL volumes (r = 0.89, P = 0.02). The gap areas typically occurred in the vicinity of the bulky calcified nodules under the native commissure. Conclusions: PVL volume, which could be affected by hemodynamic conditions, was significantly associated with the minimal cross-sectional gap area between the aortic annulus and the stent frame. These data may improve our understanding of the mechanism of the occurrence of post-TAVR PVL.
AB - Background: Quantitative assessment of post-transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) aortic regurgitation (AR) remains challenging. We developed patient-specific anatomical models with pulsatile flow circuit and investigated factors associated with AR after TAVR. Methods: Based on pre-procedural computed tomography (CT) data of the six patients who underwent transfemoral TAVR using a 23-mm SAPIEN XT, anatomically and mechanically equivalent aortic valve models were developed. Forward flow and heart rate of each patient in two days after TAVR were duplicated under mean aortic pressure of 80 mm Hg. Paravalvular leakage (PVL) volume in basal and additional conditions was measured for each model using an electromagnetic flow sensor. Incompletely apposed tract between the transcatheter and aortic valves was examined using a micro-CT. Results: PVL volume in each patient-specific model was consistent with each patient's PVL grade, and was affected by hemodynamic conditions. PVL and total regurgitation volume increased with the mean aortic pressure, whereas closing volume did not change. In contrast, closing volume increased proportionately with heart rate, but PVL did not change. The minimal cross-sectional gap had a positive correlation with the PVL volumes (r = 0.89, P = 0.02). The gap areas typically occurred in the vicinity of the bulky calcified nodules under the native commissure. Conclusions: PVL volume, which could be affected by hemodynamic conditions, was significantly associated with the minimal cross-sectional gap area between the aortic annulus and the stent frame. These data may improve our understanding of the mechanism of the occurrence of post-TAVR PVL.
KW - Functional modeling
KW - Paravalvular leakage
KW - Transcatheter aortic valve replacement
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85043472714&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85043472714&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.ijcard.2017.11.106
DO - 10.1016/j.ijcard.2017.11.106
M3 - Article
C2 - 29544953
AN - SCOPUS:85043472714
SN - 0167-5273
VL - 258
SP - 313
EP - 320
JO - International Journal of Cardiology
JF - International Journal of Cardiology
ER -