TY - JOUR
T1 - Resting metabolic rate in obese and nonobese Chinese Singaporean boys aged 13-15 y
AU - Stensel, David J.
AU - Lin, Fu Po
AU - Nevill E, Alan M.
PY - 2001
Y1 - 2001
N2 - Background: Previous studies investigating the hypothesis that a low resting metabolic rate (RMR) is a cause of obesity yielded discrepant findings. Two explanations for these findings are the use of imprecise methods to determine obesity and a failure to control for differences in fat mass (FM) and fat-free mass (FFM) when comparing RMR values. Objective: This study tested the hypothesis that RMR is lower in obese than in nonobese boys (with the use of precise methods to quantify body fatness and with adjustment for differences in both FM and FFM). Design: Forty Chinese Singaporean boys aged 12.8-15.1 y were recruited. Boys were classified as obese (n = 20) or nonobese (n = 20) on the basis of their adiposity index (ratio of FM to FFM: >0.60 = obese, <0.40 = nonobese) determined by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry. RMR was determined by using indirect calorimetry. RMR values were compared by using both linear (analysis of covariance) and log-linear (analysis of covariance with log-transformed data) regression to control for differences in FM and FFM. Results: Age, height, and FFM did not differ significantly between groups. Body mass was 13 kg greater and FM was 16 kg greater in the obese boys than in the nonobese boys (P < 0.001). After control for FFM and FM, RMR did not differ significantly between the groups. Conclusion: When body composition is appropriately controlled for, RMR does not differ significantly between obese and nonobese boys.
AB - Background: Previous studies investigating the hypothesis that a low resting metabolic rate (RMR) is a cause of obesity yielded discrepant findings. Two explanations for these findings are the use of imprecise methods to determine obesity and a failure to control for differences in fat mass (FM) and fat-free mass (FFM) when comparing RMR values. Objective: This study tested the hypothesis that RMR is lower in obese than in nonobese boys (with the use of precise methods to quantify body fatness and with adjustment for differences in both FM and FFM). Design: Forty Chinese Singaporean boys aged 12.8-15.1 y were recruited. Boys were classified as obese (n = 20) or nonobese (n = 20) on the basis of their adiposity index (ratio of FM to FFM: >0.60 = obese, <0.40 = nonobese) determined by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry. RMR was determined by using indirect calorimetry. RMR values were compared by using both linear (analysis of covariance) and log-linear (analysis of covariance with log-transformed data) regression to control for differences in FM and FFM. Results: Age, height, and FFM did not differ significantly between groups. Body mass was 13 kg greater and FM was 16 kg greater in the obese boys than in the nonobese boys (P < 0.001). After control for FFM and FM, RMR did not differ significantly between the groups. Conclusion: When body composition is appropriately controlled for, RMR does not differ significantly between obese and nonobese boys.
KW - Analysis of covariance
KW - Chinese Singaporean boys
KW - Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry
KW - Fat mass
KW - Fat-free mass
KW - Indirect calorimetry
KW - Log-linear regression
KW - Obesity
KW - Resting metabolic rate
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0034869515&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0034869515&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1093/ajcn/74.3.369
DO - 10.1093/ajcn/74.3.369
M3 - Article
C2 - 11522562
AN - SCOPUS:0034869515
SN - 0002-9165
VL - 74
SP - 369
EP - 373
JO - American Journal of Clinical Nutrition
JF - American Journal of Clinical Nutrition
IS - 3
ER -