抄録
Figurational sociology with its analytical tool the social “figuration” and its focus on the “socio-genetic” study of the transformation of culture and manners—the “civilizing process”—has made an important contribution to the sociology of sport and leisure. For all its strengths however questions can be raised about the approach: about the empirical and theoretical adequacy of its central concept, the “civilizing process”, and about the Figurationists’ claims to methodological “distinctiveness” and inherent superiority compared with alternatives. In raising these questions, the rival merits of alternative approaches in the sociology of sport and leisure are seen, approaches which can be viewed as complementary to Figurationist accounts but which are presented only stereotypically by Figurationists, whose special pleading for their own “distinctive method” can be seen as a potentially limiting factor in the further development of the sociology of sport and leisure.
本文言語 | English |
---|---|
ページ(範囲) | 177-194 |
ページ数 | 18 |
ジャーナル | Loisir et Societe |
巻 | 10 |
号 | 2 |
DOI | |
出版ステータス | Published - 1987 1月 1 |
外部発表 | はい |
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- 社会学および政治科学
- 金属および合金