TY - JOUR
T1 - The global education policy of school-based management in conflict-affected contexts
T2 - Current reach, prominent rationales, and future research
AU - Edwards, D. Brent
AU - Higa, Sterling
N1 - Funding Information:
Multilateral aid agencies Asian Development Bank Global Partnership for Education Inter-American Development Bank Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development United Nations Children’s Fund United Nations Education, Science and Culture Organization World Bank Bilateral aid agencies Australian Agency for International Development Canadian International Development Association Danish International Development Agency Dutch Ministry of Foreign Affairs German Agency for Technical Cooperation Japan International Cooperation Agency Norwegian Agency for Development Cooperation Swedish International Development Agency UK Department for International Development US Agency for International Development Non-governmental organizations Inter-Agency Network for Education in Emergencies Global Coalition to Protect Education from Attack Global Facility for Disaster Reduction and Recovery
Funding Information:
Caldwell, 2005; de Grauwe, 2004; Shoraku, 2008), the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD, 2013), the Australian Agency for International Development (Parandekar, 2014; Westhorp et al., 2014), and the Swedish International Development Agency (Abu-Duhou, 1999).
Funding Information:
4. In alphabetical order, the multilateral organizations searched were: the Asian Development Bank; the Global Partnership for Education; the Inter-American Development Bank; the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development; the United Nations Children’s Fund; the United Nations Education, Science, and Culture Organization; and the World Bank. The bilateral agen-cies searched were: the Australian Agency for International Development, the Canadian International Development Association (and its more recent name, as of 2013, the Department of Foreign Affairs, Trade, and Development), the Danish International Development Agency, the Dutch Ministry of Foreign Affairs, the German Agency for Technical Cooperation (and its more recent name, the German Society for International Cooperation, as well as the German government-owned development bank), the Japan International Cooperation Agency, the Norwegian Agency for Development Cooperation, the Swedish International Development Agency, the UK Department for International Development, and the US Agency for International Development.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2017, © The Author(s) 2017.
PY - 2018/4/1
Y1 - 2018/4/1
N2 - For those who focus on the role of education in international development, the approach to education governance of school-based management (SBM) has been the primary means by which the participation of community members has been incorporated into the provision of education. However, while SBM is a well-known approach to governance that has become a global education policy, in that it is widely promoted, adapted, and implemented, a trend that stands out—and which is addressed in this paper—is the use of, and reference to, SBM in work on conflict-affected contexts (CACs). Indeed, there has been insufficient attention directed at understanding how SBM is advocated in these contexts. Our intention is to use the present paper as a point of departure for further discussion on issues that arise in relation to the intersection of SBM and CACs. With that in mind, we seek to characterize the extent to which international organizations espouse support for SBM, particularly when it comes to its applicability in CACs; to review the rationales that are invoked in favor of this governance model, again with a focus on CACs; and to highlight important areas for future research.
AB - For those who focus on the role of education in international development, the approach to education governance of school-based management (SBM) has been the primary means by which the participation of community members has been incorporated into the provision of education. However, while SBM is a well-known approach to governance that has become a global education policy, in that it is widely promoted, adapted, and implemented, a trend that stands out—and which is addressed in this paper—is the use of, and reference to, SBM in work on conflict-affected contexts (CACs). Indeed, there has been insufficient attention directed at understanding how SBM is advocated in these contexts. Our intention is to use the present paper as a point of departure for further discussion on issues that arise in relation to the intersection of SBM and CACs. With that in mind, we seek to characterize the extent to which international organizations espouse support for SBM, particularly when it comes to its applicability in CACs; to review the rationales that are invoked in favor of this governance model, again with a focus on CACs; and to highlight important areas for future research.
KW - Community-based management
KW - conflict-affected contexts
KW - global education policy
KW - international organizations
KW - school-based management
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85046728757&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85046728757&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1177/1478210317742213
DO - 10.1177/1478210317742213
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85046728757
SN - 1478-2103
VL - 16
SP - 306
EP - 320
JO - Policy Futures in Education
JF - Policy Futures in Education
IS - 3
ER -