TY - JOUR
T1 - The Significance of Properly Reporting Turnover Frequency in Electrocatalysis Research
AU - Anantharaj, Sengeni
AU - Karthik, Pitchiah Esakki
AU - Noda, Suguru
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 The Authors. Angewandte Chemie International Edition published by Wiley-VCH GmbH
PY - 2021/10/18
Y1 - 2021/10/18
N2 - For decades, turnover frequency (TOF) has served as an accurate descriptor of the intrinsic activity of a catalyst, including those in electrocatalytic reactions involving both fuel generation and fuel consumption. Unfortunately, in most of the recent reports in this area, TOF is often not properly reported or not reported at all, in contrast to the overpotentials at a benchmarking current density. The current density is significant in determining the apparent activity, but it is affected by catalyst-centric parasitic reactions, electrolyte-centric competing reactions, and capacitance. Luckily, a properly calculated TOF can precisely give the intrinsic activity free from these phenomena in electrocatalysis. In this Viewpoint we ask: 1) What makes the commonly used activity markers unsuitable for intrinsic activity determination? 2) How can TOF reflect the intrinsic activity? 3) Why is TOF still underused in electrocatalysis? 4) What methods are used in TOF determination? and 5) What is essential in the more accurate calculation of TOF? Finally, the significance of normalizing TOF by Faradaic efficiency (FE) is stressed and we give our views on the development of universal analytical tools to determine the exact number of active sites and real surface area for all kinds of materials.
AB - For decades, turnover frequency (TOF) has served as an accurate descriptor of the intrinsic activity of a catalyst, including those in electrocatalytic reactions involving both fuel generation and fuel consumption. Unfortunately, in most of the recent reports in this area, TOF is often not properly reported or not reported at all, in contrast to the overpotentials at a benchmarking current density. The current density is significant in determining the apparent activity, but it is affected by catalyst-centric parasitic reactions, electrolyte-centric competing reactions, and capacitance. Luckily, a properly calculated TOF can precisely give the intrinsic activity free from these phenomena in electrocatalysis. In this Viewpoint we ask: 1) What makes the commonly used activity markers unsuitable for intrinsic activity determination? 2) How can TOF reflect the intrinsic activity? 3) Why is TOF still underused in electrocatalysis? 4) What methods are used in TOF determination? and 5) What is essential in the more accurate calculation of TOF? Finally, the significance of normalizing TOF by Faradaic efficiency (FE) is stressed and we give our views on the development of universal analytical tools to determine the exact number of active sites and real surface area for all kinds of materials.
KW - CO reduction
KW - N reduction
KW - electrocatalysis
KW - turnover frequency
KW - water splitting
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85115053104&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85115053104&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1002/anie.202110352
DO - 10.1002/anie.202110352
M3 - Comment/debate
C2 - 34523770
AN - SCOPUS:85115053104
SN - 1433-7851
VL - 60
SP - 23051
EP - 23067
JO - Angewandte Chemie - International Edition
JF - Angewandte Chemie - International Edition
IS - 43
ER -