TY - JOUR
T1 - Vertebral fracture after removing pedicle screws used for posterior lumbar interbody fusion
T2 - A case report
AU - Mataki, Kentaro
AU - Fukushima, Makoto
AU - Kaneoka, Koji
AU - Ikeda, Kotaro
AU - Kumagai, Hiroshi
AU - Nagashima, Katsuya
AU - Miura, Kousei
AU - Noguchi, Hiroshi
AU - Funayama, Toru
AU - Abe, Tetsuya
AU - Koda, Masao
AU - Yamazaki, Masashi
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2018 Elsevier Ltd
PY - 2018/11
Y1 - 2018/11
N2 - It is uncommon to remove pedicle screws after posterolateral lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF), and there are a few case reports of vertebral fracture involving holes remaining after screw removal. We report a case of the vertebral fracture after removing pedicle screws instrumented for PLIF. A 66-year-old woman with osteopenia, who underwent PLIF at L4–S1 10 years earlier, underwent PLIF at L3–L4 to correct adjacent-segment degeneration. We removed L5 and S1 pedicle screws, and inserted L3 pedicle screws. After surgery, she presented with severe progressive low back pain. Computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) revealed an L5 body fracture involving the pedicle screw holes. Revision surgery, including posterolateral fusion from L3 to S2 alar iliac and L5 vertebroplasty, was performed. One year after the revision surgery, the patient remained pain-free and returned to normal activity. Possible reasons for instrumented vertebral body fracture after pedicle screw removal are decrease of vertebral mass, increased mechanical stress caused by PLIF at the adjacent segment, stress-shielding-related osteopenia, and spinal imbalance. Vertebral body fractures associated with spinal implant removal are rare, but possible, especially in elderly patients with osteopenia and osteoporosis.
AB - It is uncommon to remove pedicle screws after posterolateral lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF), and there are a few case reports of vertebral fracture involving holes remaining after screw removal. We report a case of the vertebral fracture after removing pedicle screws instrumented for PLIF. A 66-year-old woman with osteopenia, who underwent PLIF at L4–S1 10 years earlier, underwent PLIF at L3–L4 to correct adjacent-segment degeneration. We removed L5 and S1 pedicle screws, and inserted L3 pedicle screws. After surgery, she presented with severe progressive low back pain. Computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) revealed an L5 body fracture involving the pedicle screw holes. Revision surgery, including posterolateral fusion from L3 to S2 alar iliac and L5 vertebroplasty, was performed. One year after the revision surgery, the patient remained pain-free and returned to normal activity. Possible reasons for instrumented vertebral body fracture after pedicle screw removal are decrease of vertebral mass, increased mechanical stress caused by PLIF at the adjacent segment, stress-shielding-related osteopenia, and spinal imbalance. Vertebral body fractures associated with spinal implant removal are rare, but possible, especially in elderly patients with osteopenia and osteoporosis.
KW - Pedicle screw removal
KW - Posterolateral lumbar interbody fusion
KW - Vertebral fracture
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85053661099&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85053661099&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jocn.2018.04.019
DO - 10.1016/j.jocn.2018.04.019
M3 - Article
C2 - 30243598
AN - SCOPUS:85053661099
SN - 0967-5868
VL - 57
SP - 182
EP - 184
JO - Journal of Clinical Neuroscience
JF - Journal of Clinical Neuroscience
ER -